Sunday, April 28, 2024
01:31 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS News

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Asif Amin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 221
Thanks: 81
Thanked 274 Times in 126 Posts
Asif Amin will become famous soon enough
Default Women clearing CSS complain of marginalisation

Dawn New Article By Jamal Shahid on 26-10-09


ISLAMABAD, Oct 25: They say that educated women can raise a developed nation. But the sad reality is that obstacles, many deeply rooted in our society, remain there to block women’s full participation in most of the fields, particularly in the government.
Yet again, educated women seemed to have been “unfairly” dealt with during the recent Central Superior Service (CSS) examinations.

Some of the girls, who excelled in the 2008 exams, believed that wom en representation in the CSS appointments were grossly disfigured in the male to female ratio. Out of the 4,247 who appeared in the CSS examinations, only 157 females qualified and passed the exam.

“Of these 157, only 57 have been selected for civil service,” said one candidate who cleared both written exam and the interview but was still not allocated a position in the government.

A record number of 445 vacancies were conveyed to the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC).

But the commission did not allocate 88 vacancies due to “non-availability of suitable candidates.” According to a CSS instructor with a private academy, “This appears to be the highest of injustice because both vacancies and qualified candidates, especially girls are available. Boys securing positions in the 600s (rankings) have been appointed to the best groups. But girls securing positions in the 200s and 300s have been left out.” The instructor, a CSS officer himself, also pointed out provin cial disparities, where lowest of the lowest scoring Sindhi candidates were allocated good groups.

A female candidate with a bright record throughout her academic career was also refused an opportunity to serve her country as a civil servant despite passing the CSS examination.

She said: “So much so, PM (prime minister) of Pakistan was generous enough to allocate 28 extra seats to the Balochs in addition to their quota. Why can’t the PM extend the same generosity to the bright female candidates, who make up 50 per cent of the country’s population but yet denied due representation”?

“If they do not find us suitable then what exactly are they looking for? How do they find boys from Sindh, Balochistan, NWFP and AJK with such low positions (on the rankings) to be more suitable than us for the best of groups,” questioned another candidate.

According to an official in the Cabinet Division, “This is one country and specially the present government, which boasts of having one of the best female leaders of the world. It gives hope that women can also enter the mainstream and make a difference. But such unjust results disappoint and discourage women to make headways, and spread the impression that these exams are not as transparent as they are meant to be.” Female candidates believed that if anything, women should be given extra attention since they made up 50 per cent of the population – the current statistics of the world demanded this. In every field of the world the need to promote women had become more and more obvious so why not in the civil service of Pakistan.

Getting answers out of FPSC was an arduous task. No senior official cooperated “to preserve the sanctity of the only credible department in the country.” Nonetheless, one senior official summed it up by saying: “88 seats have been left empty. There just weren’t enough suitable candidates.”
__________________
ASIF AMIN
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 16 Posts
Dazzling Eyes is on a distinguished road
Default Complex issue: will take time.

This is a complex issue and it can not be solved within a night. Pakistan is a federal country and in federal services, provincial qouta has to be maintained. So this is the way through which candidates belonging to others provinces than Punjab get allocations in esteemed groups despite having low positions in overall merit list. This really hit hard candidates from Punjab regardless gender. But if it is not observed, the federating units get annoyed. It is considered that since the quality of education is not up to mark or the students of Balochistan, NWFP or Sindh do not have much access to good and quality education so this qouta system should be maintained otherwise all allocations in major groups would be taken over by Punjabis.
As concern as the women candidates of CSS, it is not worthy to criticise FPSC. 10 % woman qouta is sufficient other than open merit. But if someone who does not fulfill the requirements regarless gender, is not entitled to be allocated. Women are allocated on open merit and on special qouta. In near future, their ratio would be increased. So, they should be patient. All the best for them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Vivre sa vie sans regret's Avatar
37th Common (1st FATA)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2008 - Merit 17th
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LALA LAND
Posts: 162
Thanks: 108
Thanked 225 Times in 117 Posts
Vivre sa vie sans regret has a spectacular aura aboutVivre sa vie sans regret has a spectacular aura about
Default Query

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzling Eyes View Post
Women are allocated on open merit and on special qouta. In near future, their ratio would be increased. So, they should be patient. All the best for them.

Hi. Could you elaborate kindly in what way their ratio would be increased.
__________________
~*~ Every answer contains a new quest : A quest to non existence, a journey with no end~*~
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Senior Member
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CSS 2007Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 303 Times in 117 Posts
mahmood has a spectacular aura aboutmahmood has a spectacular aura about
Default

there is already a 10% women reserved quota. plus they can also compete on the remaining 90% seats. so i dont know why they are complaining.
__________________
Mahmood Khattak
Pakistan Customs Service
36th CTP

Last edited by Princess Royal; Friday, November 13, 2009 at 01:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Sammar Ellahi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 358
Thanks: 148
Thanked 341 Times in 164 Posts
Sammar Ellahi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzling Eyes View Post
This is a complex issue and it can not be solved within a night. Pakistan is a federal country and in federal services, provincial qouta has to be maintained. So this is the way through which candidates belonging to others provinces than Punjab get allocations in esteemed groups despite having low positions in overall merit list. This really hit hard candidates from Punjab regardless gender. But if it is not observed, the federating units get annoyed. It is considered that since the quality of education is not up to mark or the students of Balochistan, NWFP or Sindh do not have much access to good and quality education so this qouta system should be maintained otherwise all allocations in major groups would be taken over by Punjabis.
As concern as the women candidates of CSS, it is not worthy to criticise FPSC. 10 % woman qouta is sufficient other than open merit. But if someone who does not fulfill the requirements regarless gender, is not entitled to be allocated. Women are allocated on open merit and on special qouta. In near future, their ratio would be increased. So, they should be patient. All the best for them.

This is the most comprehensive & pragmatic answer to this issue.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Monday, October 26, 2009
Adil Memon's Avatar
37th Common
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2008 - Merit 120
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gujranwala
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 334
Thanked 680 Times in 280 Posts
Adil Memon is just really niceAdil Memon is just really niceAdil Memon is just really niceAdil Memon is just really nice
Default

i guess the writer is himself confused or misguided about the realities of the exam. the news item does not make any sense.
__________________
"The race is not over because I haven't won yet."

Adil Memon
Police Service of Pakistan (P.S.P)
37th Common Training Program
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Tuesday, October 27, 2009
AmBrosiaL EloQuence's Avatar
37th Common
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Isles ov attainable dreamz
Posts: 160
Thanks: 150
Thanked 209 Times in 104 Posts
AmBrosiaL EloQuence will become famous soon enoughAmBrosiaL EloQuence will become famous soon enough
Default @ "women-marginalization"

after goin through such a master piece ov poorly researched and home-worked information and an ample example ov psuedo-communication, i cudnot resist to give maself an opprotunity to express ma point ov view.

the first thing that clicks afta readin this column is that " mr. writer " is unaware ov the fact that women r given a full scape opprotunity to compete wid men on open merit-basis" plus ..i emphasize PLUS a 10% quota is also reserved for em.

and the second thing that follows is that "if mr.writer is aware bout the open merit concept along with the 10% quota for women, then the only reason for jottin down such a piece is his expression ov his extra affection for gurlz for whom he tendz to demand a 100% quota along wid open merit." agreed?

moreover, the comparative analysis ov the fact that very bright women have been refused job alhtough they passed both written nd interview portion ov cse and the not very bright boys of balochistan given extra quota for jobs is nufin but sumfin very childish and ridiculous.

in addition to this the madam which the writer quoted sayin that they ( the brutal fpsc guys i guess) only passed 157 gurls and then allocated only 57 to various groups ( extreme brutality, leavin the said ma`am jobless), left me at a loss ov wordz. cud not decide wether it was innosence or stupidity!!

mr. writer and said BB plz..this is wut u call an open house competition, an open merit game..everybody and anybody can play and win no restrictions!! the numba 157 cud have been 257 or 357.. the door is opened. if the numba wud have been limited or no quota wud have been set then the complaint wud have been valid but criticizin in such a silly manner jus for da sake ov comlainin iz jus so...childish.

definin the entire piece ov writin and its aspects in uni-phrase i wud say it was a poorly homeworked and researched piece, creatin an impact ov dysfunctional communication, anonymity ov the various sources quoted further reduced its credibility; all in all it seemed to make out an issue ov "gender bias" in css allocation context widout any former logic and solid argument put forward.

feed back will b highly appreciated.

regardz
ambrosial eloquence.
__________________
"Being exceptional is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't." (Margaret Thatcher)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AmBrosiaL EloQuence For This Useful Post:
Adil Memon (Tuesday, October 27, 2009), Hajirahat (Friday, October 30, 2009), Nonchalant (Tuesday, October 27, 2009)
  #8  
Old Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Light's Avatar
37th Common
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2008 - Merit 278
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 44
Thanks: 16
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Light is on a distinguished road
Default

I completely agree with dazzling eye and my fellow commoner Ambroisal Eloquence......i think we Pakistani ladies are very much privileged to be given such an extended support in Civil Services. We hav 10% quota completely reserved for women of our country along with open merit what more we can ask.... and it is because of this favour that alot of us ladies have been allocated in groups which otherwise in open merit we couldnt have get.............

And for provincial quota issue...dazzling eye has answered it well...i wud add further, thinking that has been projected in this news report does not represent the whole of Punjabs mindset.......i hav many well educated and sensible Punjabi friends who completely dont think on these lines ........

Regards
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Light For This Useful Post:
AmBrosiaL EloQuence (Wednesday, October 28, 2009), Hajirahat (Friday, October 30, 2009)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Women's Rights Naseer Ahmed Chandio Discussion 7 Wednesday, April 02, 2008 01:51 PM
The State of Women Rights in Pakistan from 2007 Essay Paper secondopinion02 Essays 16 Monday, September 17, 2007 08:48 PM
Women In Pakistan Mystichina Essays 3 Wednesday, September 05, 2007 08:23 PM
Woman Emancipation Khadija Rathor Essays 2 Wednesday, November 01, 2006 09:15 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.