dear i have been waiting for your posts regarding the subject.please start the company law as soon as possible. also lay out the scope of company law for css. i mean the syllabus prescribed by the fpsc does not clearly mention the scope. so which topic ll you cover in company law?

@TheUniter: Brother no one can deny your efforts at this group. because you are the one who continued this discussion and your contribution & co-ordination is remark able.

Well I am trying to contact RAZ (Fayyaz Bhai) I guess he has highest score at ML. As soon as possible I will display the COMPANY ORDINANCE syllabus and its importance. Hopefully it will take not more than 16 hour to maintain a contact INSHALLAH.

It might be possible RAZ bhai himself introduce the syllabus.

__________________
Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay...!!
Hazrat Ali (R.A)

@Shrd. Yes bro,Raz bhai should be consulted as this question(laying syllabus for company law)is very confusing. Looking forward to positive response.

__________________
We can trust the man of troubles but not on the man of pleasures.

Important Sections:
2
3
15 to 28
30 to 36
44 To 46
52 To 73
90 to 95 A
109 To 112
121
125
157 To 160
161
174 to 197-A
230
233
238
242
248
249
251 to260
283
Critical analysis of company law and any value addition after pointing out its shortcomings?

Wish you good luck.

Regards

__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna."
"Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain"

@Raz : Sir, we are proud of you. Thank You very Much Sir.

__________________
Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay...!!
Hazrat Ali (R.A)

@Raz.Thanks dear for your continuing contributions.

@Shrd. Dear,which topics do these sections mentioned by Raz indicate? I mean which topics have been recommended by Raz?
please start as we are already late.

__________________
We can trust the man of troubles but not on the man of pleasures.

@TheUniter: Dear soon will take this topic for discussion. please wait

__________________
Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay...!!
Hazrat Ali (R.A)

@ok dear shrd. see you soon

__________________
We can trust the man of troubles but not on the man of pleasures.

Few things confuse people more than “The Law.”

One way to reduce this confusion is to understand the differences between civil law and criminal law. Though both categories work to protect our rights as citizens, they cover very different aspects of society.


Civil Law deals with disagreements between private individuals (commercial or personal injury disputes, for example). Typically, one person will claim that the other person’s actions caused him harm, and file a civil suit seeking compensation for the damage caused.

The plaintiff (the person filing the suit) must demonstrate by a “preponderance of the evidence” that the defendant was responsible for the harm. In other words, only a majority (51%) of the evidence must support the plaintiff’s claim, which is a much lower burden of proof than is used in criminal cases.

In addition, only five of the six jurors (in a six-juror trial) or nine of the twelve jurors (in a 12 juror trial) must agree with the evidence, depending on whether you’re in District Court or Circuit Court. The jury then determines the monetary damages the defendant owes the plaintiff.

Criminal Law is designed to prevent citizens from deliberately harming each other, and involves actions that have been declared illegal by the state (murder, theft, assault, etc.). In a criminal case, the State or Federal Government brings the defendant to trial, and a guilty verdict usually results in jail time, a fine, or both.

In criminal cases, the defendant is not required to prove his or her innocence. Instead, the prosecutor must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” to a jury of 12, with a guilty verdict being unanimous. Compare that to the “9 out of 12″ rule for civil law.

A civil case can also be brought when a crime has been committed. The most famous example of this was the O.J. Simpson case where Simpson was found “not guilty” of murder in his criminal trail, but was found liable in a wrongful death civil suit a few years later. The jury ruled that the preponderance of evidence showed that Simpson was responsible for the wrongful death, and ordered him to pay damages to the victim’s family, even though the criminal trial found him not guilty.

Dear Uniter, Nasir and all those want to have ppt of the topic mention above can mail me. INSHALLAH will send you. I don't know how to share them here.

__________________
Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay...!!
Hazrat Ali (R.A)

@TheUniter: Brother here is the company ordinance by

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OF PAKISTAN

http://www.secp.gov.pk/corporatelaws...4_%20Feb09.pdf

Please share your idea how to prepare it according to the sections mentioned by RAZ bhai... I am oppressed............

__________________
Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay...!!
Hazrat Ali (R.A)