Originally Posted by kishwar Khanm

is it compulsory to make outlines or u can start directly ?

Originally Posted by dany k

First i thought of going for "not economy but politics is a key to success" but then thiught otherwise and opted "meanings and purposes of education". Here is the outline open to criticism:

1. Introduction
2. Meaning
3. Islamic view
4. glorious past of muslims
5. west in the dark age
6. perceived purpose of education in pakistan
7. real purposes of education
8. steps to revive education in pak
9. conclusion

Basically, i wrote the real purpose is character building.....muslims in past pursued edu for real purpose....west followed....in pak edu is taken as a means for securing jobs...materialistis...not the real spirit....then i explained the purposes of education (i don't remember much--awareness, character,..)....then i went on to say that there should be competent teachers like those of past to encourage edu to achieve real objectives and suggested some other reforms....in the end i concluded saying that edu obtained to educate one self can raise one to heights!!!

i also think that i should have written '7' before '6'.

please comment and do tell if i was able to comprehend the topic correctly.

Originally Posted by Taimoor Gondal

areas are almost the same. Just there is twist in topics to make the paper more analytical.
A candidate, who was reading newspaper continuesly could attempt these topics easily.
Anyhow best of luck to all the aspirants.

Originally Posted by ajnabee

i am really very confuse and even depress about my essay selection in css 2013, i have written on "Modern day communication via social networks puts an end of true and sincere relationships" in which i have frequently used net language and peculiar internet wording which were out of gramatical rules. css aspirants what do you thing, will this, be takin as my positive point or i be slaughtered by checker? help me out please

Originally Posted by behzad hussain

That can well be another approach towards topic. In fact separate institutes for Girls in education itself is a broad braces to fill in. My interpretation to the topic would have been the difference of expertise of males and females in respective fields. There purely are some fields that men can not go in and some clearly banned for women. Co-education up to some extent works, but then field for specialization should also be given due attention. Some radical approach towards different fields; as you mentioned for girls, is also needed. So thoughts are to be induced in individuals to think against the flow.
Ahhhh! there can be many interpretations of this topic, picking the best ones is on FCPS

Originally Posted by Tehman Khan

Did you use inverted commas?