Monday, April 29, 2024
02:49 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Off Topic Section > Off Topic Lounge

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old Saturday, June 26, 2010
Faseeh Muhammad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 275
Thanks: 141
Thanked 336 Times in 156 Posts
Faseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura aboutFaseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura aboutFaseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usman khalid View Post
Principles or laws are not static. These require change according to the changing circumstances. As you have mentioned that quota for Baluchistan has been increased. (if it is true) So was it not a change in law or principle?? However, I strongly support this change because it is need of hour to redress the greivances of baluchi people.

I agree with you that many influential feudal lords, jagirdars and waderas in Punjab goes scot free from tax. But it is also true in the case of Sindh. The prolbem lies in our system which calls for much needed change. Politics-Bureaucracy-Military complex is ruling our country. All these power-hungry demagogues will never want merit-system to prevail in any aspect where there own interests are harmed. Army wants favours even in competitional exams, so a quota has been reserved for them and an easy path welcomes them to civil service of pakistan. Similarly our politicians are aslo trying to get into the position where they can play the role of CSP-makers. (Politicians have demanded to appoint them as membesr of FPSC).
It is pleasing to listen from atleast one supporter of merit system that "It should be followed every where"

My intention to point out Jagirdars and Wadaras was not to pin point any particular region. The purpose of my last post was to state that the things are being followed according to a "System". I have mentioned saveral times that i neither support merit nor do i the qouta system for any favour or support it may render to me. I always emphasise the consencious that being more importnt then disagreement. I say that if the representative in the national assembely whom are elected by us decide to abolish qouta, then abolish qouta, if they decided to go with it let not any one criticize it. Qouta for baloch's was increased through a package announced by the assembely who represents none but us. so is there remain any ground to argue that perheps balochs now are getting more seats then before.

There is another thing which i donot know why people donot realize. Seats in our national assembely are allocated on the basis of population. Recent tests conducted by ISI for AD post were allocated seats in the same propotion. NFC award acknowleges Population (and now few more factors) but when comes to css people get tensed that injust has been extended to them when population is made criteria for allocation!! is it not a strange attitude. Should this be the response if 600 candidates start passing from sindh, then will people from punjab compalint about the issue??

This situation need a little apethy... Place yourself on the position of candidate from sindh who if compete is open merit will not be able to secure a position due to so many candidates from elsewhere. If he, then raises a question that why merit has not been followed every where, will you be in position to anwer his query???
__________________
Thanks & Regards
Faseeh
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Sunday, June 27, 2010
usman khalid's Avatar
40th CTP (DMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 22Elite CSP Medal: Members who previously received (CSP Award  and Member of the Year Award ) OR (CSP award + Gold Medal + Medal of Appreciation) are eligible for this award. - Issue reason: Member of the Year: Awarded to those community members who have made invaluable contributions to the Community in the particular year - Issue reason: 2012
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Khairpur, Sindh
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 2,147 Times in 983 Posts
usman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant future
Default

@Faseeh

In addition to what you have said, this is what I stress upon that now is the right time to make much needed change. If more than 500 candidates are suffering allocation problem from a single province even having much more marks than other candidates, it implies a substantial problem in our quota system. If education is the excuse, I do not agree to it.

Education has become much common than ever before with exception of Baluchistan and Some areas of K.P. Sometimes, you know, even seats remain vacant in povinces except punjab because number of candidates who qualify are fewer than seats reserved. It does not mean than people are not educated. the competition is less because of the fewer number of people.

Therfore, our system should be flexible enough to accomodate necessary changes so that frustration of so many candidates may not hinder their future.
__________________
Best end of life is not knowledge but action.
Don't limit yourself to what you think people are expecting!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Monday, June 28, 2010
marilatif's Avatar
39th CTP (MLCG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 - Merit 423Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In bed
Posts: 511
Thanks: 262
Thanked 652 Times in 414 Posts
marilatif is a glorious beacon of lightmarilatif is a glorious beacon of lightmarilatif is a glorious beacon of lightmarilatif is a glorious beacon of lightmarilatif is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Invincible View Post
.


You seem afraid of punjab.When would we learn impartiality and selflessness in our issues individually n collectively? Some guys have tried to mix up this issue with politics to serve their vested interest , can any one cite me an exemple of quota system in competative exams in developed countries?

let other province compete punjab by dint of labour not luck.

No offense is intended.

Regards,
dear invincible u r right there is no quota system in any developed country. but what is our country everyone knows very well.

how divided we are, how difference of illiteracy and development exist in our country.

dear we dont afraid from punjab neither we have any political interest. still we are students strugling for our future. when time for politics come we talk it openly.

qouta system had been suggested since the days of sir syed when there was a great difference of literacy among the indians.

last but not the least dear i being an inhabitant of sindh further the cause of southern punjab where hardly any candidate is competant enough to compete with the contestants of lahore, pindi and faisalabad. wether there should not be any split quota within punjab just like it exists in sindh.

u know in bhawalpur district literacy rate is 19% whereas it is round about 90% in lahore and upper punjab.

i think we must have an equal distribution of resources not on the basis of merit but on the basis of contribution each provice share and the right each provine deserve.

because we are not still a developed country.

regards
__________________
"pattering your life around others opinion is nothing more than slavery"
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Monday, June 28, 2010
Maha Khan's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2009Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Punjab
Posts: 1,782
Thanks: 228
Thanked 2,339 Times in 1,259 Posts
Maha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud ofMaha Khan has much to be proud of
Default

im also not in favour of quota system..its because of this that all the candidates from Karachi and Balochistan are going to allocate this year,while candidates from Punjab are facing mental agony even after securing comparativly better merit number than the candidates from Karachi and Balochistan etc...students from other provinces are also used to study in the academies of lhr for the sake of css preparation..if quota system is necessary,then Punjab should also be divided in upper and south punjab..whats the sin of the candidates who are appearing In Css exam with the domicile of Punjab???...
__________________
Fight for your dreams & your dreams will fight for you.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Monday, June 28, 2010
Faseeh Muhammad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 275
Thanks: 141
Thanked 336 Times in 156 Posts
Faseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura aboutFaseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura aboutFaseeh Muhammad has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maha Khan View Post
......if quota system is necessary,then Punjab should also be divided in upper and south punjab..whats the sin of the candidates who are appearing In Css exam with the domicile of Punjab???...
@Maha Khan,

This is what i have said some one hundred times that if people want Quota, Let there be Quota Every Where, in our national assembely, in NFC, In services, in military etc etc.

If all of us yeal for merit let there be merit every where, Just like in ur case when you say that Let Punjab be divided in two parts for the sake of representation, other parts also desire their representation secured through Quota!!!

I an imagine how annoying it will be when a candidate get through this tough exam and find itself in net-loss when candidates lower in merit get through it by allocations, but let it be decided not just for CSS, but for every aspect of our life.

And i can bet on the fact that if this issue raised at national level, will never reach a result, due to suspections of the provinces other then Punjab. Take my words for gurantee. It will be yet anohter issue added to the list of KBD and so on.
__________________
Thanks & Regards
Faseeh
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old Monday, June 28, 2010
shahi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jubail, Saudi Arab
Posts: 22
Thanks: 9
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
shahi is on a distinguished road
Default We Should have Quota System

Well a nice discussion is going on in a right direction. Before comment directly whether Quota system be allowed or not, let me enlighten about Federation and its existence.

Normally, a federation is formed between people of different regions based on mutual respect and consent for the greater interest of the people. Every region tender its capability, resources and willingness to participate in the greater interest and prosperity of the federation. Moreover, every region is willing to find answer to the following questions

1) What are the available resources in each region/state
2) How revenue will be generated
3) How resources will be allocated and divided among regions
4) How these resources will be managed and by whom with how much proportionate.

let’s take an example of Pakistan, where federation is formed by the mutual agreement of the following states (set aside Bangla & Kashmir)
1) Punjab
2) Khyber Pukhtunkhawa
3) Sindh
4) Baluchistan
How above mentioned questions are answered by every states will help us understand the subjected matter.

What are the available resources in each region?

Khyber Pukhtunkhawa :
We have fresh water resources which will be used for drinking, farming and cheap electricity generation.
Punjab:
We will use the fresh water to farm different seed (Sugar, wheat, Cotton etc) which will be utilized internally in the country and will also be exported to generate outstanding foreign reserve.

Sindh:

a) We have ports, which will be used for export and import activities.
b) We have technical labor which will be utilized in industries
c) We have coal reservoir which will be used for cheap electricity generation

Baluchistan:
We are rich of natural resources like gas, petrol and alike. Federation can use this to accommodate its energy need. In return, I will expect fresh water, wheat, sugar.

Revenue generation and resource allocation:
These regions have established mutual formulas which are used for revenues generation and distribution mechanism(NFC waghaira).

Resource Management and Managers:
Now here comes the crucial part: who will manage these resources? There are three possibilities
a) Each State will solely appoint people who will manage these resources
Merits:
1) Each state will have less or no grievance in terms of authority
2) Managers will be solely responsible for all their actions and so do the State, since the managers are nominated by the respective State, therefore it will feel solidarity and responsibility towards all actions of the managers.

Demerits:
1) Federation will loose its authority because the appointed managers sentiments will be bound solely to the respective state and will care less about federation interest, or in worst, existence.

b) Select best people across the federation, through a competitive procedure, irrespective of their descent to the region and let them manage the resources

Merits:
1) Best people will get selected and appointed
2) Federation authority will be impose at all levels and so do strengthen its writ.

Demerits:
1) Less representation of different States in federation, which will ultimately lead to spark the grievances of people that they are managed and their resources are utilized by the people who are not amongst them
2) Chances are high that the managers may take some decision which are in favor of one state while harming the interest of other.

c) Select best available people across the federation, through a competitive procedure, and allocate quota for the best people from each State to be selected to manage people and their resources.

Third option is a hybrid of first & second which is deemed considered as an optimistic approach. This procedure will serve the purpose to select best possible candidate from each state, ensure equal representation in federation, imposing authority of the center/federation and also lessen the grievances of the states.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shahi For This Useful Post:
maryamkhan (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)
  #27  
Old Monday, August 30, 2010
zeeshan1001's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lahore
Posts: 174
Thanks: 23
Thanked 101 Times in 62 Posts
zeeshan1001 will become famous soon enough
Default Woow wooww woow

Well, I am (Rana Zeeshan Pervaiz) the original writer of the letter.

The purpose was not to offend anyone. The purpose was to make government realize that providing quotas to all provinces is not the solution to the problem. The sole solution is to raise the standards of education of the provinces rather than giving concessions so that a real competition can be observed and quality people can be recruited. Whether it be all from Balochistan, Sindh(U/R) or KP. Quality and merit should be the criteria.

I belong to Multan a southern city of Multan who's education standard is worst than that of Peshawar and Karachi. If quota system is the only solution than people from Multan, Bahawalpur, Rajanpur, D.G Khan should also have separate quota. Although these are rural areas but they are not given quotas as given to Sindh(R). So these areas are being neglected too but still people from these areas have made it upto the superior services and they have never asked for any kind of quota.

So the point is that instead of just settling down issues temporarily the government should settle them permanently. Every province should improve their educational standard and STOP ASKING FOR CONCESSIONS. The point can be transformed to two words. Grow up!
__________________
“Believe in your dreams and they may come true; believe in yourself and they will come true”.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old Monday, February 11, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
kafeelahmed is on a distinguished road
Default

People in Karachi dont even sit for exams in because of this quota system and believe me they are a talented lot, the fact that they can run the banking, manufacturin sector speaks for their competence but now they just abhore the government jobs, so I believe if there is a quota in tact atleast we should get rid of it in Sindh as it is dividing Sindh more than anything else.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G.K objectives for all terminator Topics and Notes 18 Friday, January 21, 2022 01:35 AM
Notes of psychology sarfrazmayo Psychology 21 Thursday, December 11, 2014 06:42 PM
Solved Everyday Science Papers Dilrauf General Science & Ability 4 Friday, April 08, 2011 06:10 PM
Influence of joint family system on socio-economic development of Pakistan hanif.sadia News & Articles 0 Tuesday, February 16, 2010 01:58 PM
The Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources free thinker Pakistan Affairs 1 Tuesday, April 25, 2006 08:05 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.