These are different matters. Fakhru could not bear the political pressure and agha rafiq has nicely handled it. If this chairman resigned, these posts will be sold and distributed...
Recall the last chairman who got his two sons selected on rural and urban domiciles!?

what next ??

__________________
The more knowledgeable the man the more valuable the man :D

yeh netspeak hota kia hia ?? i am bemused

__________________
The more knowledgeable the man the more valuable the man :D

Sorry but your answer doesn't seem to be satisfactory. Everyone knows Fakhru Bhai was way better than Agha Rafiq, and you are saying he didn't sustain the political pressure and Agha Rafiq is stronger than Fakhru Bhai that he can handle everything? oh bro come on, give me a break.

And about the sons issue you can check in one of my earlier posts where i have exposed a bitter truth about Agha Sahab's credibility, where he was found in nepotism n excessive and illegal use of power by first sending his son on deputation in FIA and finally putting pressure on FIA authorities for his absorption in FIA. And now his other son is in the game and he found no other right time or no other suitable job in the whole country except this CCE-2013 right when his father is the Chairman SPSC. Now no matter what, but they will prove it that no one is more competent than Agha's Son and he has come up on merit and very fairly. They will managed to show and make it look transparent somehow.
So now all that seems a legal practice to you? Where did his integrity n honesty go?

Therefore, before singing lovey-dovey songs for someone you should be well-versed with the facts & figures. So now do you get it? if you still don't understand then nothing can satisfy you and your case looks like a case of deep-blind-love bro and nothing else.

for your convenience i put the said link once again, which says the story.

https://daniyalmsheikh.wordpress.com...personalities/

__________________
Jab tumhain Urooj mil jae tou teen cheezien kabhi na bholo,
Khuda, Uski Makhlooq, aur..................... apni Oukaat.

Asalam alaikum everybody. I have been silently reading all the discussion going on here since the day the screening test took place. Now, I want to say something too. I passed the test with 55 marks.

A screening test should not have 50% as passing criteria but since we didn't object to it before the test, it is useless to raise this matter now.

After that, the test was difficult keeping in view the fact that it only an screening test and not an exam for a job. So the test should have been easier. But I don't think one can claim in the court that the test was difficult so it should be declared illegal. There is no law covering this issue.

Next and the most important matter is that of wrong questions, wrong options and wrong keys. SPSC has already announced that they will compensate in this regard. What they need to do, and I hope they will certainly do, is that for the wrong questions and questions with wrong and confusing options, all the candidates should be awarded the marks and the keys should be updated. So, until decision on this matter by SPSC, protests should be called off. If SPSC doesn't compensate for it's mistakes, I will also join the protests.

After that, those saying that the paper was out in the market before time should bring forth some proof.

And as far as the use of mobile phone is concerned, it is the responsibility and moral obligation of the candidates to report such malpractice to the invigilators, especially the head invigilators/ incharge/ supervisor if the invigilator doesn't take any action or is helping a particular candidate in cheating. I know that it was the responsibility of SPSC to stop this thing but the candidates also have responsibilities. Use of mobile phones has also been reported in entry test conducted by NTS in the past.

In the end, some people have accused the chairman of being corrupt because got his son deputed in FIA, etc. I would say that let the relevant authorities take action against him in this matter. What I and many other people know is that after him assuming the chairmanship, SPSC has given jobs on merit, at least to a big extent if not completely. In the past, only a few or jobs were given on merit. So, those planning to protest for resignation of the chairman should keep in mind that rival protests in his favour are also possible. You are free to disagree with me but please be polite. Thanks

jojo mahar at some point you are exactly right ,but spsc has acknowledged few human error ,but according to me there are number of error ,,what will they award us, only 3 mark or 2 mark we are not beggar to take 2 0r 3 mark ,they should award us 10 or 8 mark because there are more than ten mistakes in paper.

__________________
Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.” – Winston Churchill

Nobody knows how many marks will be compensated. But if two or three marks make someone mendicant then he/she should also say a big NO to eight or ten marks because it will convert him/her into a BIG MENDICANT.

First of all welcome on board and i appreciate that you broke your silence and finally came up, brother i would like to submit few aspects in your kind consideration.

1st you said why we didn't protest on 50% marking before the test.

Answer = because then it would have made no sense because no one was affectee at that time, nobody knew that the test would be so unproductive, if it would be a fair exam then believe me nobody would be complaining even on 50% marks. It is was one n only awkward exam of it's kind in the history. There can be a much debate over it but let's not get into it and waste our energy.
The point is one only cries when one gets hit either by some disaster or injustice. We can't beat the drums before even something took place or actually happened. We name a child after he is born not before he came in the world.

2nd point Let relevant authorities take action against his son's issue.

Answer = It was a past incident, the point to bring it now is to talk about the morals and integrity. A person seemed involved in immoral & illegal activities in his past so his honesty and character is at stake. His past has not been stainless. Therefore, telling his achievements now that he has done so n so in the SPSC is like this Urdu proverb "Sou Chuhay kha kay billi Hajj ko challi".
You are what you carry from your past.

And as regard the proofs are concerned about the paper being out then you have to probe into it then you will definitely come to know the truth. Neither you believe us nor the SPSC. You just probe into the matter yourself by your resources and sources. Then your mind will be changed.


Thanks for uttering this hard truth in such a harsh way possible to a female mate of ours. Let me tell you one of the differences between the 3 marks and 10 marks in the best possible way you understand.

Suppose you are working as a waiter in some hotel and your pay is fixed 10 rupee per day, but at the end of the day they bamboozle you and just try to make you happy with 3 rupee tip instead of your righteous pay i.e. 10.

So if you accept that 3 rupee tip that's what makes you mendicant. Whereas the 10 rupee is your remuneration accepting which doesn't make you a mendicant but rather a self-made man.

Hope, now you get it what Saima was trying to say. And next time be polite with females specially, or i will be compelled to give you another demo.

__________________
Jab tumhain Urooj mil jae tou teen cheezien kabhi na bholo,
Khuda, Uski Makhlooq, aur..................... apni Oukaat.

I cent percent agree. My friend is working in SPSC hyd, he is an educated gentlemen. He told me the stories of corruption by previous Chairman and he has also stated that the incumbent chairman is pressure(political)-free person. the proof for this is the recent selections on ASI posts.

@Guddu

I've gone through all stuff from where you've concluded that current chairman is corrupt. Bro! I respect your views but becoming so sure on the basis of a report is not justified. Let's first research more on this view... cos blaming is not a gentleman game.

__________________
The one who sweats more in practice; bleeds less in war. (Spartan Proverb)

He may not corrupt but he surely was appointed against law/rules.

Read this thread.

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/sindh-pub...rman-spsc.html