Originally Posted by waqarabbasi

I may not approve of what you say but I defend till death your right to say

Introduction

Imposing restrictions on free speech means a halt to the intellectual and material progress of the nations. Free competition of ideas distinguishes the successful nations from undemocratic and failed nations. The defense of free speech is the basic requirement of success in a world of varied thoughts. The free speech is as important a right as the freedom of territory; people without freedom of speech are mindless slaves like sheep on altar of sacrifice. Free speech, being the basic right of individual, ensures the inapplicability of physical tortures and humiliations on holding or not holding a certain thought. Freedom of speech provides world a systematic course of living peacefully with differing opinions. It opens the horizon of disagreeing in an agreeable way; it promotes an atmosphere of free competition of ideas where one is free to choose right from the wrong. The free speech should be defended to prevent humanity form being a victim of majority’s propaganda against minority. Agreeing with differing thoughts is not compulsory but providing the freedom of speech despite differences is essential for the survival of coexistence.


A.Why defense of free speech is the inherent right of humans?

1. The freedom of speech ensures the basic right of human equality irrespective of what ideas one holds.
2. Defense of free speech provides a chance to the ideas of minority to compete with others’.
3. It ends the perpetration of physical tortures and humiliation on holding or not holding any views.

B.Nations protect this right with the constitutional safeguards; the right is protected by the constitution of democratic states, USA, Pakistan, and China. The United Nations regards it a basic right of humanity as the right to live in peace.

C.How defenders protect free speech from external compulsions


1.Fight with religious and social pressures imposed by society
2. A strong disregard for external physical torture and humiliation for having differing views.
3.Defense against manipulation of facts and reality by dominating groups

D.The achievements free speech brought for humanity

1. An abundance of ideas, literature and art.
2. The powerful media and aware nations of the world.
3. The improved capacity of individuals and nations to make the right from the wrong
4. It broke the shackles of despotism and brought an era of accountability and transparency.
5. It provides an equal opportunity to the ideas of any social or economic class to be presented and defended.
6. A demand for accountability of the wrongs done to humanity by any nation or individual.

E.the defense of free speech demands constant vigilance

F.The course towards free speech is still thorny.


1. Differing opinions are treated by majority with humiliations and torture
2. Right to information still suffers from hiding tactics of governments.
3. Media persons suffer for opening the political and economic corruptions of powerful
4. Powerful group more successfully interpret its ideas whereas weak section does not have the resources.

G. How the free speech should be defended?

1. A Collective action of nations to end hostilities on the basis of differing opinions.
2.The State should defend the right of media of bringing corruption and social issues in the limelight.
3. Free competition of ideas can end the hostility of religious and social differences.

Conclusion

Originally Posted by safeer khan

A good introduction. It will surely persuade the examiner to read further.

Outline is relevant but too dense. It requires effort on the part of the reader to find linkage between ideas. Unfortunately, the examiner won't put any effort into that.

As they say that an easy reading is damn hard writing, I would advise you to write by putting yourself in the place of the examiner.

I particularly like that how you have incorporated the status of minorities in your essays.

But I disagree with your one point that one who do not have freedom of speech is mindless. Rather say that all the complex thoughts in one's mind would make one go crazy and it will have grave psychological consequences.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Bonaparte

Thank you very much for correction.

" Misrepresentation of nations among international communities"

I guess it is very vague sentence I ever used which should have been " Poor mechanism of surveillance on Freedom of speech depict negative image of a country "

Anyway, thank you again for your guidance as it will be extremely worthy for us during exams.

Originally Posted by waqarabbasi

The time we live in is the winter of the world

The frosty situation of human rights and human dignity are enough to tell us that humans are passing through a time of winter. It is not only a crisis of human dignity; it is the insensitivity of world towards political, economic and social problems of man. The time we live in is characterized by indifference, cut-throat competition, the struggle for power and subjugation of weak. The coldness in feelings disregards sympathy for people suffering from wars of power. There is frost on feelings, on love and care; life has been made a hell for those who do not have resources to fight the strong. Winter is multifaceted; it exists in political, economic and social relations. No part of human life is free from the frost of cruelty; The nations fight for more territory and power, no matter this fight destroy the people; the go for more industrial development , no matter how this development affects climate change and global warming. The world we live in is devoid of the heat of love for all; it is the winter which divides and humiliates people.

A.the winter causing crisis to human dignity

1.reverence is offered to the powerful
2.no equality of rights on the basis of human dignity

B.human rights are buried under frost

1.innocent children are killed by Israel for no reason and there is no voice against this action
2.Illegal detentions and tortures in Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq.
3.War crimes in Palestine; demolition of infrastructure and attacks on public life.
4.The violation of women rights in Saudi Arab and connivance of USA and UN

C.Absence of heat of responsibility and care for human beings

1.Poorly constructed policies of WTO and IMF and resultant poverty in the world.
2.The indifference of Middle Eastern Muslim countries towards Palestine.
3.The world’s zero percent preference for peacefully solving the issue of Syria and Iraq.
4.Criminal acts of funding terrorists by powerful states for their self-interests.
5.Increased industrialization and resultant climate change and global warming.

D.Persistent winter made the social relation frosty; communication revolution makes people busy in debates on social forum, whereas in reality they become indifferent to the pains of fellows. Families and friends do not have such strong emotional ties as they had before the communication revolution.

E. frost of winter can be melted only with the sun of love and care

Conclusion


it took my one and a half hour, I request to all the members to analyse and evaluate it.

Originally Posted by safeer khan

As usual, your introduction is just awesome.

Outline is also nice.

I would like to add one point at the end that if winter is here then spring is also not far behind.

Moreover you could give a reference to the world wars, calling them the autumn and argue at the end of the essay that it is a cycle of joys and woes.

And don't worry about the time at this point. Important thing is that you are stressing your mind.
Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by waqarabbasi

The time we live in is the winter of the world

The frosty situation of human rights and human dignity are enough to tell us that humans are passing through a time of winter. It is not only a crisis of human dignity; it is the insensitivity of world towards political, economic and social problems of man. The time we live in is characterized by indifference, cut-throat competition, the struggle for power and subjugation of weak. The coldness in feelings disregards sympathy for people suffering from wars of power. There is frost on feelings, on love and care; life has been made a hell for those who do not have resources to fight the strong. Winter is multifaceted; it exists in political, economic and social relations. No part of human life is free from the frost of cruelty; The nations fight for more territory and power, no matter this fight destroy the people; the go for more industrial development , no matter how this development affects climate change and global warming. The world we live in is devoid of the heat of love for all; it is the winter which divides and humiliates people.

A. the winter causing crisis to human dignity

1. reverence is offered to the powerful
2. no equality of rights on the basis of human dignity

B. human rights are buried under frost

1. innocent children are killed by Israel for no reason and there is no voice against this action
2. Illegal detentions and tortures in Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq.
3. War crimes in Palestine; demolition of infrastructure and attacks on public life.
4. The violation of women rights in Saudi Arab and connivance of USA and UN

C. Absence of heat of responsibility and care for human beings

1. Poorly constructed policies of WTO and IMF and resultant poverty in the world.
2. The indifference of Middle Eastern Muslim countries towards Palestine.
3. The world’s zero percent preference for peacefully solving the issue of Syria and Iraq.
4. Criminal acts of funding terrorists by powerful states for their self-interests.
5. Increased industrialization and resultant climate change and global warming.

D. Persistent winter made the social relation frosty; communication revolution makes people busy in debates on social forum, whereas in reality they become indifferent to the pains of fellows. Families and friends do not have such strong emotional ties as they had before the communication revolution.

E. frost of winter can be melted only with the sun of love and care

Conclusion


it took my one and a half hour, I request to all the members to analyse and evaluate it.

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

Waqarabbasi, please no offense, but let just focus all on one topic at a time. You can start new thread where you can post random essays. However, just let this thread be focused on one topic so it could be explored in depth without getting any other thing in mind.

Originally Posted by safeer khan

The point is not to keep on digging into a single topic. Rather we must move on to the next topic as soon as possible.

Essay writing is a technique not an exercise of getting in depth knowledge of a particular topic.

Moreover, enough time had been spent on the previous topic before he wrote the next outline.

One should not ask others to slow down, but should increase one's own pace.

Finally, who cannot write on every topic, can at least look at what others have written.

Please, you too don't get offended or hurt.

Show us what you have written. We will help you in good faith.

And Hello everyone, comment on my outline.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by safeer khan

I DISAPPROVE OF WHAT YOU SAY, BUT I WILL DEFEND TILL DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT.

Introduction:

Any relevant qoute,

(A) I would protect your right to say because

1- I believe in Freedom of speech.

2- My constitution grants you this right in article 19.

3- I cannot deny the same right to you that I seek for myself.

4- My own liberty to say will be seized by others if I will seize yours.

5- I want to see a tolerant society.

6- I have seen the wonders of diversity of opinion.

7- My knowledge is not absolute, so my disapproval is also not ultimate.

8- Your opinion will give me a new perspective to ponder.

9- you might be wrong about a particular matter but right about other matters.

(B) How I will protect your freedom of speech:

1- I will be more tolerant and less judgmental.

2- I will not abuse this right to hurt your feelings.

2- I will instill awareness among my people.

3- I will even die protecting your right to say, and I will die as a hero.

Conclusion.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by waqarabbasi

Bonaparte! try to explain things in a manner that examiner does not feel difficulty in understanding. if any of our points troubled him in understanding he will certainly not go through the whole essay. so avoid making things complex.

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

I am not asking anybody to slow down. I am just saying that the current topic has registered only three days so far. Just give it some more time before moving on. It is good thing that you have gain this much speed but still this forum is for all, beginners and experienced alike.
I am not hurt, just placing my point of view