can anyone please mention is that mandatory to attach provisional certificate? and is internship letter comes under work experience?
kindly confirm and guide me..
thanks

had hai yar, bachon ki terhan behave kertay ho sab, lolxxx, come on you are going to become an officer in NAB, abhi b kids ki terhan socho gay tu kya ho ga tumara?
do u have any receiving/proof of submitting documents in NAB? did u submit it by yourself? nahin na? tcs slip can't be consider as proof, lolx they don't need reason to disqualify you, lolxxxx

grow up bro, Be Mature & think Big....

When we submitted the docs to the NTS officer they took undertaking on a paper by taking our signature. Thus, no need to worry about the documents.

Just to make one thing clear for you, my friend. The receipt which TCS gives you after you've submitted your documents to them for delivery to a particular destination is sufficient proof. This is because TCS is a reputable company. Everyone knows and accepts that TCS delivers the documents to the recipient and you get a confirmation via text message that TCS has completed its job. If it is unable to make delivery, it gives you a reason for not being able to do so. This is the stance courts take with regard to delivery by TCS.

Having said that, I am not going to bother sending my documents again. Submitting once is enough. We can all see that Waqas is being extremely cautious. I, however, don't want to irritate the people involved in the process by sending them my documents again. I can see Waqas is making sure that there are no loose ends on his side which is why he's taking so many precautions but that's his choice.

Relax!

Nop, , internship does not fall under the criterion of "Work Experience".

Experience means only the experience in government/semi government, autonomous body etc.

yep, waqas should stay with his choice, as far as the matter of proof is concern, can you convince Court what you have sent in that envelope to be delivered to NAB? lolx.
Once again, i would say......BE MATURE, lolx

Hmm... well, a person says he sent the documents and the recipient denies by saying that the documents sent were incomplete. They cannot deny by saying they never received anything because the receipt is proof that an envelope was sent. Whether the envelope was empty or the documents sent were incomplete is an issue on which evidence is then led. Based on the evidence, the court decides in favour of one party or the other.

I'm sure this point which you have raised must have been raised in the past before as TCS has been around for a long time. The courts must have set some guidelines which helps them determine what to do in such cases.

It could be either ways,e-g if police is going to raid at certain place where there is an illegal activity going on the warning lights are put to off and sumtimes covertly they conduct operation,but in case traffic police use warnings to forewarn the people.so it depends on the situation

This is what I had in mind when I chose my answer.

TCS is only responsible for delivery of package, they are not concerned with anything inside the package/envelope, they receiver may claim that packet was full of empty pages or some rough documents, lolx thus such proof shall be considered as null & void in the eye of Law.

Totally agree with you Nayeem. Its a childish approach to send documents again if already submitted.and TCS receipt is no proof that documents are received.We got to trust on NTS.