try this one bro. 051-9208246 (Mr. Mujahaid Akbar Baloch Director Training NAB HQ).

kisi HR k banday ka number mil sakay to it would be better. jo log islamaad mein hain saray akathay ho k NAb HQ chalay jaein to inquire about the result.

good idea bro
0519209106 nab hr. i just called them but that person was reluctant to give any info.

Any one else have authentic source????

dear the person on other side said wrong no but I think you gave right no but he was reluctant to give answer so he said wrong number in irritaion

I tried this number too but they did not atend, so busy or irritated

Sorry I could not try this one as now office time is over so will try tomorrow.

I have gotten personal cell no of NAB Chairman Mr Fasih Bukhari but I don't know what to do or what I should ask him so any one have nice idea please share me if anyone want talk himself then contact me in person.

No appointment will be done unless Parliament passes the NAC bill, I have maintained my position that I took based on the information shared by a source that relates to the highest office.

Hello dear ones,
As per my belief, things are the same as they were and I have received the copy of the file of the W.P mentioned earlier and is around 30 pages including 4-5 pages of Order Sheet, which I shall scan and post here but to be honest I do not know how to post it here.

In addition to the above, With all due respect and not offending anyone, I offer the following replies and considerations

Bhai ap nay shayad LDA ghalti say type ker dia I presume. But the name you quoted "Mohsin Saeed" is not in the writ petition as the attested copy is in front of me. Yes there is one Mohsin who is Mohsin Ali Khan at Petitioner Number 5 in the writ petition and is from NAB Regional Office Rawalpindi, now if you could please confirm that is he the same person so that the news can be authenticated. And there is also Saeed Iqbal Khan at petitioner No. 79 from NAB headquarters, Islamabad. So there are two persons Mohsin and Saeed, so please check their place of job as per the W.P and confirm which one is yours.

At the same time, I have got news from within the petitioners that NO COMPROMISE has been reached, so there remains a clear ambiguity.

Dear Roa Sahib, no offence intended, but the stay order is not of the civil court but is from the High Court meaning thereby, not being inclined towards Judiciary, but speaking realistically, that NAB is powerful, but the Superior Judiciary is more powerful, I don't know why your reference was talking so lightly about it. I have heard from the tongues of the officers of Highest ranks in bureaucracy, use abusive tone for the Judiciary out side, and inside the Court they do not even dare to look into the eyes of the Judge. Not to forget the information that the petitioners in the W.P are ready to file a contempt if the letters are issued.

But nonetheless, we pray that the letters be issued soon as the source of Rao sb might be the most authentic one. Lets all pray.

Apart from the above, if the letters are to be issued, despite the Stay Order being in field and considering the contempt to follow, I think that they might be in a form of some wording like, you have been selected SUBJECT TO THE VACATION OF THE STAY ORDER AND DECISION OF THE W.P BY THE IHC...... so that the candidates who are not selected, shall at least be informed that no need to worry of the stay or the trainers or the letters of the NAC as they have, unfortunately, not been selected.

As of NAC, if it is passed before our hiring, the hiring shall become null and void. and if it does not pass and the government is dissolved, then even the hiring shall continue as it is as the caretaker setup, I believe shall not interfere much in the projects already started.

Thats all I have to share presently, shall update soon with the W.P posting but please anyone guide me how can i post it here after i have scanned it because I do not plan to type it .

Regards and good luck.

Sir the man Mohsin Saaed I was talking about isn't a petitioner or a NAB employee,ha is AD in LDA(Lahore Development Authority),he is a good friend of me,he worked as a Liasion Officer to solve the cases of corruption in LDA through NAB,so he is very often in NAB Regional office Lahore,here he has contacts wid many NAB employees,I told earlier that he told informed me afater I repeatedly called him that an employee of NAB who was one of the writ petitioner has told him that story and he lated told it to me when I asked him to get some info. I'll post the name of that man tomorrow In shaa Allah ,as he is a petitioner in this case,he would really be able to tell the exact situation of the stay(which he earlier said is to be settled becausre their demands R going to be met).

@ All,

Matter of Stay will be resolved soon InshAllah because NAB is vigorously working over that, but major concerns that I want to clear from the seniors on this forum, specially lawyers and Establishment Division members. My concern is that what would be the future of NAB employees if they are transferred to surplus pool after new Law? What would be chances of retention in new organization? What would be chances of being kicked out from the job? Though courts are there but upto what extent courts would protect us? These are the real concerns that I am having in my mind. Can anyone guide over these concerns???

Mr.Naqvi !
You can upload scanned copy of W.P at some other site and place the link here.
Adverse part of the story once again :-D