Sunday, April 28, 2024
05:48 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC (CCE)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
haseebbaloch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sukkur
Posts: 536
Thanks: 90
Thanked 104 Times in 79 Posts
haseebbaloch is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kainat khan View Post
yes absolutely right..its very disheartning 😪totally opposite to our expectations...if they had to conduct test,they must hv to include both math nd islamiat...may be i am wrong but there was not evn a sngle question about ths year :/ cant be say now that one is intellignt or not..its only is tht one is lucky or not👎to hv an exact tukka ability :/
yup i also wished to be included maths becoz most of candidate belong to MBBS holders if math may be included then there would be a tough competition

Quote:
Originally Posted by sansaar View Post
Dear All,

I know it was totally unexpected for all of us but I must Appreciate SPSC for taking test peacefully. Test was simply for filtering out the candidates and they are done with this. It is useless to file a case and all that!!

Those who are saying that test was out of the syllabus and all that I would like to ask one thing from them. What if you had passed this exam?
yes test was quiet good but there were invigilator wo were helping special students n were googling in their mobile for the required answer

im pass but still some candidates have got through illegal means
__________________
The more knowledgeable the man the more valuable the man :D

Last edited by marwatone; Monday, December 29, 2014 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Posts merged.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to haseebbaloch For This Useful Post:
Indomitable (Monday, December 29, 2014)
  #32  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
Guddu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Unknown
Posts: 173
Thanks: 54
Thanked 182 Times in 87 Posts
Guddu is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

So who is going to courts against SPSC?
__________________
Jab tumhain Urooj mil jae tou teen cheezien kabhi na bholo,
Khuda, Uski Makhlooq, aur..................... apni Oukaat.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
noomee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: THUL DISTT: JACOBABAD
Posts: 495
Thanks: 340
Thanked 91 Times in 73 Posts
noomee is on a distinguished road
Thumbs down

We should all be united on single platform and should struggle against these cruel policies of SPSC.
__________________
Some thing is better than Nothing
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to noomee For This Useful Post:
Indomitable (Monday, December 29, 2014)
  #34  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
pureapak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 854
Thanks: 333
Thanked 487 Times in 320 Posts
pureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the rough
Default

Some of the failed candidates or the relatives of such candidates who are posting unjustified criticism on this "SCREENING THING", should be talking some logic at least.
It's a matter of serious concern for the whole Sindh if SPSC continues going corrupt.
So You guys must appreciate SPSC's positive gesture lately. This transparency, this delivery and this promptness were never witnessed before. I think we are heading to unprecedented reforms in our provincial service commission which is no doubt in the broader good of Sindh at large.
So,regardless of your individual failures, you guys must encourage the collective success.
Regards :
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pureapak For This Useful Post:
Would be (Monday, December 29, 2014), zuhaib ahmed (Monday, December 29, 2014)
  #35  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Karahi
Posts: 78
Thanks: 13
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Fahim Chandio is on a distinguished road
Default

for all those who think that there was merit in spsc this time, bhaiyon this was just an effort to throw candidates (as many as they can) out of competition. SPSC should now be renamed as adi faryal public service commission. lol. yeh log itne barey jugadhi hain ke jis ko appoint karna hoga uski copy change hojayegi. and rate list ke barey main tou sab jante hain.
knocking doors of court will be useless now, its too late.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fahim Chandio For This Useful Post:
inayatali (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)
  #36  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
Ano nymous's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ano nymous is on a distinguished road
Default

No doubt that SPSC has conducted this this very well but the pattern of the test was totally unexpected and unjust. if the test was decided to be conducted at the end of 2014 then the gen knowledge questions should have contained the matters of 2014 instead of 2013.
If SPSC could not manage to go with a new paper for new year what is the purpose of asking for a demand draft of Rs 1000/- from the applicants. The application fee is meant for arranging, organizing and conducting the test in the best possible manner but to my amazement the question containing dates of 2013 were illogical and to those who have qualified that section too, i would only say "BHAIYO OR BEHNO AP JESE MAHAAN CANDIDATES KO CSS KELIYE APPLY KRNA CHAHYE YE SEATS AP KI SHAAN KE SHAYA NISHAAN NAHI " =)
__________________
Love People, Use Things, Do Not Use People, Do Not Love Things !!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ano nymous For This Useful Post:
inayatali (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)
  #37  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
Mohammad Asghar's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Posts: 99
Thanks: 31
Thanked 67 Times in 51 Posts
Mohammad Asghar is on a distinguished road
Default

Although i did`nt clear the test by only by 2 marks. I can not say that the process is illegal or inappropriate. Eligibility test should be done in order to filter out the candidates. In my point of view, the questions asked were not irrelevant or difficult. One needs to demonstrate tremendous G.K and Current affairs knowledge. Keeping that in view, the questions were very relevant. however, i did`nt prepare for it causing me to disqualify for the CCE.
If anyone had any reservation or doubt regarding the legality of this test. He/She should have proceeded against SPSC before taking this test. There was enough time for that purpose (more than one year). Talking about the legality after taking the test is Inappropriate
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mohammad Asghar For This Useful Post:
Ana (Monday, December 29, 2014), HUNK007 (Tuesday, December 30, 2014), pureapak (Monday, December 29, 2014), Would be (Monday, December 29, 2014)
  #38  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
DrMFK's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Karachi
Posts: 29
Thanks: 49
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
DrMFK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ano nymous View Post
No doubt that SPSC has conducted this this very well but the pattern of the test was totally unexpected and unjust. if the test was decided to be conducted at the end of 2014 then the gen knowledge questions should have contained the matters of 2014 instead of 2013.
If SPSC could not manage to go with a new paper for new year what is the purpose of asking for a demand draft of Rs 1000/- from the applicants. The application fee is meant for arranging, organizing and conducting the test in the best possible manner but to my amazement the question containing dates of 2013 were illogical and to those who have qualified that section too, i would only say "BHAIYO OR BEHNO AP JESE MAHAAN CANDIDATES KO CSS KELIYE APPLY KRNA CHAHYE YE SEATS AP KI SHAAN KE SHAYA NISHAAN NAHI " =)
where did they ask for 1000 rupees? are you talking about the fees they took at the time of submitting the forms last year?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 50
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
fyifyi is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Related to CCE

After the excruciating wait of six years commission finally decided to conducted test in Dec that had to take place originally in 2013. Notwithstanding the arguments how the prevalent red tapism delayed its materializing and played with the future of many aspiring candidates from Sindh and deprived them of their rightful participation and either it’s good or bad to conduct screening test to cut down the number of candidates. The issue at the hand is how below the par and flawed the content of the test is. Candidates were instructed to prepare from Current Affairs and yet not a single question would qualify to come under this question. The MCQs from the Everyday Sciences section were so vague and I could say to the extent that some were factually incorrect or have such options. The GK questions were not by any definition were ‘General Knowledge’. How on earth would candidates know an XYZ event took place at an XYZ mountain and that event is not even of this year. Even the MCQs asked related to Sindh were chosen in such wrongful manner that the candidates living in cities other than Khi, Hyd or Sukkur didn’t know the answers or it wasn’t the ‘common knowledge’. I even have doubts on the correctness of grammar portion too. I’ve taken CSS exam and had given multiple NTS tests so have an idea how these tests are like, how to prepare for such exams and how properly MCQs section is prepared in them.
Now the question is, THIS IS IT?! I mean the candidates waiting for years and now couldn’t apply for next CCE-if it’s going to happen in regular fashion, of which I’m uncertain as of yet- due to age limit issues. I’m not a sour loser and It isn’t whining by a failed candidate by any means as some successful candidates are putting it. I’m sure there are many whose ‘tukkas’ worked this time so is this how SPSC judges the aptitude of its candidates? What would successful candidates do when such irregularity and injustice would happen when you will be giving your written exam or interviews later? If you didn’t point it out now this will become a pattern as it has always been.
The only solution to me seems is the lowering of passing criteria from 50% to 40% because conducting this test again would be a huge burden on SPSC and is nearly impossible. I’m sure many who are working in government departments of Sindh are part of this wonderful forum so it’s a request to them to play their role in helping your fellows from Sindh.
So candidates, RAISE YOU VOICE AND CREATE A DIFFERENCE BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fyifyi For This Useful Post:
Indomitable (Monday, December 29, 2014)
  #40  
Old Monday, December 29, 2014
noomee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: THUL DISTT: JACOBABAD
Posts: 495
Thanks: 340
Thanked 91 Times in 73 Posts
noomee is on a distinguished road
Thumbs down

for me the syllabus was changed in following manner.

1. Current affairs was changed into Past Affairs
2. Every day science was changed into Pure Science
3. Pakistan affairs was changed into Unknown Sindh affairs
__________________
Some thing is better than Nothing
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to noomee For This Useful Post:
inayatali (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Today in Pakistan History javedkey Pakistan Affairs 0 Tuesday, November 25, 2014 01:01 AM
Psychology, By David G. Myers, 6th Edition sarfrazmayo Psychology 24 Sunday, July 20, 2014 03:47 PM
Us-north Korea Relations atifch News & Articles 6 Wednesday, November 01, 2006 05:28 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.