this is not proper way. the department should announce the result. after that its they may conduct intreview of those who are at top in list.
dear dony worry about expenses, i am practicing at high court.
i know how to manage all this

My interview time is 8.30 am on october 22. I applied for JIO (still regretting the fact that I did not apply for the post of AD)

Depends on outreach of mentality. Can you please elaborate on what basis you got the call? It should be not like this that you received the call and you don`t care about anybody. I am from Punjab and our calling process has not yet started. But I support all of them from Sindh. KPK, Balochisan who don`t even know what basis they were not shortlisted.

It is the right of the candidate to know why he is not there and why the other person is. In fact a transparent recruitment policy will be beneficial both in-service and out-service.

Brother both of you please guide me how this NAB hiring is transparent? I will appreciate if you can make me understand why such policies are needed?

It took 11 months to decide to conduct interviews on a non working day i.e sat 20th Oct 2012.
It took 2 months to realise that the list of incomplete documents candidates should be pasted on its web site.
Incorrect repliessuch as the results would also be pasted on NTS/NAB website also though it was done in 2007.
NTS was not allowed to disclose the results of psychological test, NTS conducted it for the very first time in its history despite the presence of specialised FPSC.
02 similar tests of psychological were taken on 2 different dates of different candidates.
A surprising ratio of 1.15 person per seat was followed for calling candidates for interview.
E-mail,SMS,letter,phone calls were made 02 days before the interview date.
For 60 seats of Sindh's JIO,AD,DD interviews will be finalized in 2 days only.
All above are facts.Its up to you to interpret and conclude.
Good luck.

going to court for a cause don't make sense to you?is it illegal or what make you feel that it is nonsense?

Brother what will be main point of case?????? see during all this recruitment process NAB has not issued any list of candidates except for the list of those persons whose documents were missing and thats only to give everyone fair chance...Why nw everybody is agitated that why there is no any list for shortlisted candidates??? I just simply want to say that they have remained silent and secret throughout this process. when the NTS result was announced everybody was able to know only his or her marks.. were we able to assess our standing??? its the commendable effort of the guys mnaqi and ash at this forum which helped us all to at least have some idea abt our standing as per marks....no hard feelings to anyone please. Wish everyone all the best.

I am not interested in going into litigation. There are many reasons for me. First important fact is that of not having the resources time and money to spend on only elasticity to come. Second the sole discretionary power lay into the hands of the management of NAB. Third this will hurt other candidates, if they were rightly chosen. Fourth this will create bad raputation for the candidate in the eyes of the NAB. Fifth, even if, for the sake of arguments, one is given a chance in the Interview don't you think this would lead the NAB officials to give him a tough time and throw him/her easily in the interview (which is a simple method.) Last but not the least, even if one is given a chance to work in the NAB at the end one will face the NAB officials with great difficulty.

The most important point from the legal aspect is the "02 similar tests of psychological were taken on 2 different dates of different candidates." Rest are the most weak. One, who is interested, must pay attention to the people of second psychological test only.

I will not recommend this. Rest is up to one who has the courage.

@All
Any idea of going to court makes no sense at all...if we go some days back, we will find ourselves to curse all the NAB officials who went to court causing delay in our recruitment process.. and so are we going to do now. don't we???
It is obvious that all of the members of this forum can't be selected at the same time and some of us must be dropped out; going court means we are creating hurdles for those who are going to be selected. Plz be positive and hope for the best having the thought that some of our friends will join NAB at least..
Think about it & live with the positive approach

Recruitment policy of NAB in particular, and all government departments in general.

Because NAB hired NTS so NTS was responsible up-to written test. And most probably NTS was not given the directions by NAB to declare psycho test results. We will have to see the agreement between both parties for further confirmation and it will be presented in court if the case is pursued.

Everybody was silent because all believed that it will be done fairly as was done before. But now the cat is out of the bag. Everyone was able to access the result by writing roll number or name. The lists you are talking about mnaqi and ash were extracted through these methods. Even you can access

NTS did its job really well. The final decision making regarding interview is NAB`s. FPSC follows the rule in CSS that every written passed candidate is interviewed. The final merit list is declared after interview. Then why not NAB. Even if I am hired, I will pursue for a transparent recruitment policy in every department.

So now what are your points that this process is transparent after NTS.

No one is trying to hurdle anyone. All of us are talking about everyone have the right to know why(reason or base) some were called, and the rest were dropped. You should not sense any harm in it And it will definitely be a hurdle for those who used influence to get called. So things need to be cleared.

If you mean positive approach by leave things as they are then I am sorry, I prefer the opposite . We have been facing this just because of this type of approach, no one tried in the past to make things better for coming generations.