Brother, since you've appeared for the interview of JIO and have been selected in the past, I have a few questions for you. I was hoping if you could answer them for me. You've got first hand experience so I would like your guidance. Please.

Can I email you or speak to you on the phone? Please do reply.

I am not talking about seats+15%. I already mentioned in my post what is fair policy. Read my post 916

any tips for this specific interview please

Money is my problem too otherwise I might have done it a year back on PPSC. I am not going to court now, but I am supporting those who are thinking of it. If I am hired, i will have the money and then I will go to court or any other forum for a transparent recruitment policy in every department.

So court is the only option, because we don`t have kindhearted PM or President.

No harm will be for candidates who are rightly chosen. Only those will be harmed hired unfairly.

What is the use of that reputation that cannot help the candidate in struggling for right thing. What the candidate will do with jobless good repute? Bad Repute is better than letting the bad thing happen.

Life is hard. Nothing is given in plate without struggle. At-least if they reject, it will lead to fair recruitment policy for other deserving candidates

Nothing is difficult, If one is hired he cannot be terminated without criminal charges against him. And it will even benefit that candidate that no seniors will be pushing him to do a wrong thing.[/QUOTE]

@ S A Haider

Could you explain how you would support the demand for a transparent policy when you have been called for an interview but people who have not been called challenge your interview call? You've mentioned that you got 70 marks in the test. Now consider another person who got 71 or 72 marks. Now we don't know how you or that person who got 71/72 marks performed in the psychological test. You may say all you want that you performed well but that is merely an assumption on your part. Only the team who was responsible for checking the psychological test papers knows how you and that other person performed. Now, the person who got more marks than you gets rejected and you are called for the interview. How would you deal with this? That person would be feeling that he deserved to have been called... Would you step down and let that person take your place? Answer honestly.

I have asked you these questions bearing in mind that both you and the other person do not have any influence and are competing simply on merit.

I hope you do not take offence to any of my questions.

Bhai we are arguing the same thing, that make it transparent so that everyone knows why shortlisted and why not. So that who are rejected are satisfied, and the credibility of the selected ones is not harmed. Otherwise, even if I am selected, every rejected candidate can charge me for using influence.

Those who will wait for 10-15 days, will not get any benefit.

Because interviews will be complete and after that they will start training immediately

So if any one wants to get benefited, my advice will be to go in court right away and take the stay order

I am from Punjab too, I have heard that Punjab interview will be started after eid.

What makes you think that those who are rejected will be satisfied even after being given the reasons for one's rejection or selection? What if they are not happy with the reasons?

Please note that the reasons here is the assessment NAB arrived at after going through a person's psychological test paper.

Dear Libra75,

I received interview letter, call on cellphone and SMS as well regarding communication of Interview going to conduct on 18-10-2012. I am from Sindh (U) applied for the position of DD and got 59 in written test and don't know about the result of Psychological test on 04-08-2012.

dear friends, those who intend to file a petition should consider:

1.they cannot fight an organisation as even if they win , the Nab would go in appeal in supreme court and advocates there charge 20 lacs plus

2. as per law chairman enjoys discretionary powers. the court decides in the light of law.

3. you people are quite helpless.at any stage nab can prove that you failed to qualify psychological test . therefore you were dropped . how would you convince that you had really qualified.

4. as far as , recruitment procedure is concerned the sindh public service commission never discloses marks of written , not even waiting list of candidates is issued and no final marks after interview are made public. most importantly , it recruits nearly 3500 persons each year...in case court decides in your favour then discrimination cannot be practiced and how would they undo that recruitment of decades in thousands .....that;s impossible for the court as well.
5.the hearings will go on for at least 2 years and then another 2 years for implementation . the nab cannot stay without giving a tough time to the mischief mongers . aur joining after 4 years of struggle to you know it better ....what ways you will be victimized