i think its only da case when sum1s husband is also a csp where as ur husband aint csp

The spouse should be a government servant.not necessarily a civil servant.

__________________
Yes,the first morning of creation wrote what the last dawn of reckoning shall read.Omer Khayyam.

If you must say yes, say it with an open heart. If you must say no, say it without fear.
Coelho

http://www.establishment.gov.pk/

?????

What brainy82???

i posted the website for reference!!policies aree mentioned in it...seniors plzz helppp

my uncle serves in grade 20 in this dpt...quality of life is great here.there exist some problems in this dptt but these are nothing in front of quality of life in this dpt...i got PAAS..:thnx

Ma'am, I think I've read this notification about posting of Women Govt. Servants. I will only be able to give you the Reference i.e. Notification No. and Date tomorrow.

I however remember that it says that the women Govt. employees will be posted at the working station of their Husbands, if married, and if the husbands are also in govt. service.

Secondly, for unmarried female Govt. employees, they will be posted in the station where their family is residing.

Regards

__________________
Conscious does make cowards of us all...

These instructions were issued by the Establishment Division, Cabinet Secretariat's Office Memorandum No. 8/1/2009-R-II dated 25-10-2010.

Subject: POSTING OF SERVING HUSBAND AND WIFE AT THE SAME STATION AND POSTING OF UN-MARRIED FEMALE GOVERNMENT SERVANTS AT THE PLACE OF RESIDENCE OF PARENTS/FAMILY

The Establishment division, with the approval of Prime Minister, issued instructions regarding posting serving husband and wife at the same station vide OM No. 10/30/97-R-II dated 13.5.1998. Similar instuctions were issued for posting of un-married female government servants at the place of residence of parents/family vide OM No. 10/30/97-R-II dated 17.12.1999 and posting of married female government servants at the place of residence/posting of their husband who are not in government employment vide OM No.10/30/97-R-II dated 21.4.2006

The standing committee of National Assembly on Cabinet Secretariat, Inter Provinicial Coordination & Special Initiatives in its meeting held on 21.10.2010, observed that the above mentioned instructions are not being followed and the grievances of the applicants are not being attended/addressed by Ministries/Divisions/Departments.

The Committee also asked for data in this regard.

Regards

__________________
Conscious does make cowards of us all...

http://202.83.164.26/wps/wcm/connect..._CONVERT=false


ummm its a long url hope it works!!

Cantts want MPAs` funds but not their say

RAWALPINDI, Dec 14: The cantonment boards in the country are so short of cash to keep the wheel of development going that they have started looking toward the elected representatives for funding.

However, the cantonment authorities are not ready to give the parliamentarians a say in the affairs of their financial affairs.

The 52 cantonment boards in the country are working under the administrative and financial control of Defence Ministry with their funding totalling Rs64.3 million coming from the government. Local station headquarters of the army look after their affairs with a serving brigadier heading the respective cantonment board as president.

Sources told Dawn that the cantonment boards mainly depended on their own sources of income to meet the expenditure on establishment, health, education, provision of sewerage, drinking water, street lights and maintenance of roads etc.

They said with increase in population, the cantonment boards were facing financial problems to bridge the gap between income and expenditure. Except a few cantonments located near big cities, the financial position of others did not allow launching of important development projects.

They said in some cantonments, legislators faced difficulties as the local armed forces barred officials of cantonment boards from getting funds from legislators. Upon this, they said, the Ministry of Defence decided to formulate a policy and directed the Military Lands and Cantonments Directorate to submit its comments. The directorate wrote to the ministry requesting to allow it to utilise the funds from lawmakers.[

The letter said: “The issue of seeking funds from parliamentarians is not a problem with Military Lands and Cantonments Department. The problem is that local armed forces authorities have started discouraging cantonment boards from seeking funds from politicians for fear of their interference in cantonment affairs.”

It suggested that the problem can be solved if services headquarters` allowed/encouraged the boards to seek development funds from parliamentarians.

It is evident that the Ministry of Defence is not in a position to provide the development funds required by the cantonments. The cantonment boards, therefore, have no option but to seek financial help from elected representatives (MNAs/MPAs/senators) out of their allocated quota to improve the infrastructure as well as execution of development projects.

When contacted, MNA from NA-56 (Rawalpindi Cantonment) Malik Abrar Ahmed said: “Cantonment authorities are not allowing us to start water schemes saying it would be done by RCB from its own resources. It is a strange attitude as the availability of clean drinking water is a basic problem in Rawalpindi.”

However, he said, the legislators were not facing problems in Rawalpindi in construction of roads and streets. “We want to utilise the funds and prefer RCB for the launching of development works.”

He said sometimes problems occurred but they were resolved after holding meetings with cantonment authorities. “As we are the people`s representatives and know well about the genuine problems of the residents compared to government officials, it would be better to consult legislators for launching of development schemes,” he said.

This reporter tried to contact the director of Military Lands and Cantonments but he was not available.

Rawalpindi Cantonment Board (RCB) Executive Officer Rana Manzoor Ahmed Khan told Dawn that the ministry was working on a policy regarding funding of development schemes by legislators and the Directorate of Military Lands and Cantonment had also got the comments of cantonment boards.

“There is no problem in Rawalpindi as the RCB is getting funds from MNAs and MPAs for development projects. The station headquarters has not made any objection on the issue of inauguration of development schemes completed through funds provided by legislators.”

cheers,
floydian

__________________
Police Service of Pakistan (PSP)
39th Common Training Program