Agreed to u to some extent but i am not going to admire him this much. Well he is also a human being and i find him taking some wrong decisions. Let us hope that he will be able to cover up his mistakes, at least.

Regards

I am so sorry for what u are talking about. Actually, i also noticed this sort of things but it is up to us. We have to compete with the media of the whole world but in doing so we are exploiting our actual traditions and culture. This is a cultural problem.

Musharaf has given us freedom of expression but it is up to the users that how they are taking advantage of this freedom. they need to be pragmatic and they should take car of our real culture. They should display the real picture of media instead of coping others.

Regards

__________________
The world is my oyster!

@ Impossible

Yes, he might have done good things for Pakistan. After all when u usurp power and call the shots all as autocrat and dictator, and spend the taxpayers' money at will like taking a huge entourage to foreign countries, it becomes a burdensome thing that you also payback some of the luxuries to nation in kind.

My dear friend, the question is not of progress or development that has been made in his time, rather it is of legitimacy. If we bring Green Span from the US' Federal Reserves and install him here as PM or President, I think he will manage all our bad or good things quite successfully and in a better manner. But it will totally be illegitimate and unconstitutional thing.

regards,

__________________
Unless you see the cause of 'Seen' in something that transcends the 'Seen', you will never get to truth.

(1) 4th military dictator
(2) did against his oath after intervention
(3) told lies with the nation
(4) his Political ambitions
(5) his extremely pro-US Policy
(6) his blunder of privatization

positives r

(1) Enlightened moderation

i.e. war b/w Reformists and extremists....
if he wins, Pakistan will b an Islamic model state but in case of his failure, Pakistan will hav consequences like Afghanistan and Iraq.

debatable topic.....
i think v r only in need of ruling of Constitution

I think Pakistan's faith wont be like those of Afghanistan and Iraq. Situations are pretty different. After all, we are an atomic power. We are doing at our best.US has good relations ith us. There are some other reasons too.

Regards

__________________
The world is my oyster!

Constitutional should be functional at its best. That matters. Do u mean to say that we are in need of democracy through this constituion? But this time this new democarcy should be some different and functional one. We do nt want to repeat our history of failing demoracies.

Regards

__________________
The world is my oyster!

Yeah i already have mentioned that his actions have short term positive but long term negative imapcts on Pakistan. We will come to know abt those worse impacts by and by. But still hope is here. Let us hope that he will cover up his bad decision in an appropriate manner.

Regards

__________________
The world is my oyster!

Salam

dear's
according the political scenario of the world "WE NEED MUSHARAF NOW"
time will tell about the conditions later.

Thanx
Ahmad Bilal

Salaam

Agreed to ahmed66. If we are talking about illegitimacy of governance, then we should be aware of the fact that what good in comparison is attributed to the so called legitimate political governments of Pakistan. Did they threw Pakistan on the road to success?
While in comparison, the army rule has atleast done so in regard of developing the private sector and building new energy resources for Pakistan. And I think that these actions will have a long term impact on our economy. For his foriegn policies, I must say that he is not the only one who has been wrong with his decisions, what about the others who had also been pro-americans. I dont remember any government in Pakistan which was not pro-american. Yet on the other hand, we can count numerous good points in his regime, which are facilitating the environments of growth and some time from the american madness of anti-terrorism oops, sorry, anti-muslim terrorism

__________________
Freedom Ltd.