this case was in the cause list of Islamabad HC for TUESDAY, 20 NOVEMBER, 2012. i personally dont have any idea about nature of the case, however its title shows that its a writ petition, and it is related to service.

previously one of our friends claimed that he had filed it against current recruitment process, he may, plz, inform us about nature of the case.

for cause list: http://www.ihc.gov.pk/CauseList/Causelist_REGULAR.pdf

I think chances of new National Accountability Commission Bill are receding now. The govenrment is faced with some other issues and coalition partners have developed disagreements with PPP on the issue of Karachi Operation. MQM has recently assailed PPP on its stance for Karachi operation, and will not likely see eye to eye with government when it comes to passing the NACB. ANP has serious reservation on this new law too, and says that it will vehemently oppose it. There is staunch opposition of PMLN that has been reiterating its intentions to knock it down when presented in the National Assembly. PPP is left alone and it is less likely to venture this solitary move.

Next month will transpire the things.

MehrAli was claiming to have filed a petition on the ground that NAB had ignored the quota for disabled people but when I asked him to provide us with the details of his petition, he did not do so. The petition which he had posted had nothing to do with it. I, too, am not aware of the nature of this case nor the reliefs claimed in the petition. However, I would like to clarify that the word service there does not mean that it has anything to do with cases dealing with matters relating to service. Service holds another meaning when used in legal jargon. In court proceedings, when someone has filed a case in court, the court gives summons to the other party to appear before the court. This summons is also sometimes called service. Simply put, it is one of the components of a court proceeding. I list two examples, one in English and in Urdu:

1. Have the parties been served for appearance in court?
2. Kiya service hogaye the un par?

Service only means notice of court. The cause list never mentions any details of the case be it its nature, its facts, prayers, arguments, etc. It only mentions the current stage of the case.

thank u for ur explanation of word "service" over here.

further name of the petitioners are
1.Aliya Rashid
2.Mirza Irfan Baig

Logically speaking , psychological test me dosra chance is liye dia gaya k few candidates were shouting that they hv nt received the letters aur...furthermore psychological me koi answers final ya sahe ya galat nh hote ....to agar leak bh hojae to ap khud btae k agar question hai " should we retreat from kashmir " ab aap khud btao k is ka sahe answer strongly agree, agree , neutral , disagree ya strongly disagree hoga ........ so there is no final answer in psychological ...others should also highlight this argument through newspapers aur agar koi answer suggest bh kia jae phr bhhar bnda apne mind k hisab se he choose karege .....aur koi bh siwae chand k sare answers recall nh kar sakta....furhermore . ye kisko pta tha k test dobara hoga k wh beth jate k bd me daige ??? ....jn low merit walo ko chance mila wh to waise bh shortlist nh hue ....so it's totally transparent and flawless.....bake jo apne intelligence claim kar rahe hai ye bta de k is se pehle kitne accomplishments hai in sahibaan ki....hehehe.....hoge b or c grades inke aur chale hai daway karne ......be a wall rather bulwark against them......we can also sue those individuals who have tried to affect us illogically ....r u guys with me .....

@ storm

thank u for ur explanation of word "service".

further name of the petitioners are
1.Aliya Rashid
2.Mirza Irfan Baig

Here the question arises, whether these 2 were also among the candidates ???
If so, then ......
If not, then there is no need for all this hue n cry !

__________________
Worldly victories and losses are too ephemeral...True Success lies in the Victorious Life After Death..

Dear I have gone through the Cause List of High Court ... In my opinion, the word 'Service' here means that this case pertains to Service matter !!!
as u can see other cases in the cause list such as


W.P. 3699/2012 Police Matter[/COLOR] Ch. Muhammad Siddique V/s SHO
CM 1/2012

Crl. Appeal 15/2012 Narcotics[/COLOR] Anwar Sheed V/s State


W.P. 2980/2011 Family Matter[/COLOR] Muhammad Noraish V/s Ms. Nazia Shaheen & others


HENCE here the word Service means it belongs to some service dispute (may be appeal from the decision of Service Tribunal)

Moreover there is another case concerning NAB in the same cause list wherein the word service is written !

__________________
Worldly victories and losses are too ephemeral...True Success lies in the Victorious Life After Death..

You're right! I didn't click the link earlier. My comment was based on the cause list of the Sindh High Court. I didn't realise Islamabad High Court had a different kind of cause list. In Sindh, they don't put the nature of the case in the cause list as IHC is doing it. They just put names of parties, case number, serial number, stage of the case.

We must not lose faith. This case could be an appeal, something to do with one person's seniority. Could be anything but we must keep our faith in God.

in my opinion you are right, that the word "service" here refers to the nature of the case; for four reasons:

1st,,,wherever this word appears in the cause list the defendant is there some govt dept;
2nd,,,in one title of the case there appears the word "damages", which clearly shows that such words refer to the nature of the cases;
3rd,, the words "service" also appears in one case which is numbered as of year 2010, and its very difficult that in case of 2010, summons is served now; and
4th,,, summons is issued before first hearing, while in this case it was 2nd (or may be 3rd) hearing.

whereas the question that it may be an appeal is concerned, i think, that its not an appeal case, as title of appeal case always containes word "A", like CA, civil appeal, Cr.A., criminal appeal, ICA, intra cort appeal.

after-all, i mentioned the cause list only to know if anybody had some connection to this case, as MrMahrAli had claimed that he had filed this petition...... i personally do not know that either this case is, or not, about recruitment test/interview.

cause list: http://www.ihc.gov.pk/CauseList/Causelist_REGULAR.pdf